Best 140 80 R17 Motorcycle Tire: Compare 10 Options

#1 · Best Overall

1. Continental TKC 70 Rear

• Size: 140/80 R 17
• Rim Size: 17 in
• Weight: 15.6 lb
• Load Capacity: 716 lb

Best for: Road and light-trail touring.

Why it ranks #1: It specifies a rear 140/80 R 17 tire and 17-inch rim, with tubeless construction and stated suitability for road and light off-road riding.

Continental’s TKC 70 is explicitly positioned for on-road riding and light off-road adventures, giving mixed-route riders a defined versatility target. Its tubeless technology adds a practical setup detail, while the listing also describes reinforced construction and an optimized profile for durability and predictable handling.

The TKC 70’s rear 140/80R17 size and 17-inch rim specification establish its listed wheel application. Continental describes an advanced tread design and compound for traction across varied surfaces, connecting the tire to its road and light-trail use case. Reinforced construction is said to resist wear, while the optimized profile targets stable, predictable handling across terrains. Tubeless technology is specified as an added safety and convenience feature, relevant to riders whose compatible setup uses tubeless tires.

Skip it if you need a higher stated load capacity; the Kenda K673 Kruz radial listing specifies 1,019 pounds.

The TKC 70 suits riders combining paved travel with light off-road routes and wanting a tubeless rear tire. Its 716-pound listed load capacity and light-off-road positioning are relevant boundaries for heavier loads or demanding terrain.

Listed on Amazon as: Continental TKC 70 Rear Motorcycle Tire 140/80R17 Adventure Touring

#2 · Best Trail Option

2. Michelin Anakee Wild Rear

• Size: 140/80-17 (69R)
• Rim Size: 17 in
• Weight: 14.8 lb

Best for: Mixed-surface adventure rear.

Why it ranks #2: This rear tire lists 140/80-17 and a 17-inch rim, with an enduro and trail focus plus off-road-oriented tread details.

Michelin’s offset blocks and curved tread grooves are described for off-road performance, especially on soft and challenging terrain, giving the Anakee Wild a clear adventure focus. This 140/80-17 rear tire also emphasizes on-road stability and comfort through its front/rear casing design.

The Anakee Wild is identified for enduro, roadster, and trail use, with its rear position specified in the title. Offset blocks and curved grooves are associated with off-road performance in soft and challenging conditions, while Michelin cites its front/rear casing design for on-road stability and comfort. The compound and tread pattern are also described as supporting longevity for extended adventures. These features make the listing relevant to riders moving between road and trail, rather than those seeking only a road-touring emphasis.

Skip it if you mostly ride paved touring routes; the Bridgestone Battlax BT46 is described for town use and long touring.

Choose the Anakee Wild for a rear 140/80-17 adventure tire when trail capability and on-road comfort both matter. Its terrain-oriented tread is a boundary for riders whose use is exclusively paved-road touring.

Listed on Amazon as: Michelin Anakee Wild Rear Tire (140/80-17)

#3 · Highest Listed Capacity

3. Kenda K673 Kruz Radial

• Size: 140/80R17
• Rim Size: 17 in
• Weight: 20.1 lb
• Load Capacity: 1019 lb

Best for: High-load cruiser touring.

Why it ranks #3: Its 140/80R17 size and 17-inch rim align with the search, while the listing gives a 1,019-pound load capacity; it is marked FT.

Kenda’s bias/belted casing pairs a stated 1,019-pound load capacity with a 140/80R17 size, giving cruiser riders a tire focused on carrying capacity and controlled handling. Deep, wide tread grooves support all-weather cruising, while the listed rubber compound targets mileage and traction across changing conditions.

The bias/belted casing is specifically described as improving handling and carrying high loads, making its construction relevant to riders who prioritize stability while carrying weight. Deep, wide grooves are intended for all-weather cruising, and the unique rubber compound is cited for improved mileage and traction in varied weather. Kenda also describes an inflated tire shape intended to improve straight-line stability and cornering. This listing specifies a 17-inch rim size and 140/80R17 tire size.

Skip it if you need a front-specific listing; the Shinko 777 is explicitly identified as a front tire, while this Kenda listing does not specify position.

Choose this Kenda for a 140/80R17 application where load capacity, cruising grooves, and stability are priorities. Its listing emphasizes casing and weather performance rather than a specific front or rear position, so that distinction matters when selecting.

Listed on Amazon as: Kenda K673 Kruz Radial Tire – 140/80R17 FT

#4

4. Pirelli MT60 Rear

• Size: 140/80-17
• Rim Size: 17 in
• Weight: 7.03 kg
• Load Capacity: 2.2 lb

Best for: Enduro road and trail.

Why it ranks #4: The listing identifies a rear 140/80-17 tire and 17-inch rim, and describes road use on enduro bikes with off-road performance.

Pirelli’s MT60 is optimized for road use on Enduro bikes while also promising off-road performance, giving riders a clear mixed-use purpose. The 140/80-17 rear designation and 17-inch rim size identify the intended wheel application for buyers comparing adventure-oriented tire options.

The product description puts road use first for Enduro bikes, while also stating excellent off-road performance, making the MT60 relevant to riders who split time between paved and unpaved routes. Its rear position and 140/80-17 size help define the installation role, and the specifications list a 17-inch rim. The supplied information does not describe tread construction, wet-road behavior, or a usable load rating, so the stated mixed-use purpose is the primary basis for comparison.

Skip it if you need detailed wet-road braking claims; the Bridgestone Battlax Adventure A41 lists specific wet braking and water-dispersion features.

The MT60 fits Enduro riders seeking a rear tire described for road use with off-road capability. Its mixed-use purpose is clear, but buyers needing detailed wet-weather or construction specifications will find limited information in this listing.

Listed on Amazon as: Pirelli MT60 Rear Tire (140/80-17)

#5

5. Pirelli MT 60 Rear

• Size: 140/80-17
• Rim Size: 17 in
• Load Capacity: 467 lb

Best for: Non-radial rear replacement.

Why it ranks #5: This listing specifies rear position, 140/80-17 size, and a 17-inch rim, though it describes the construction as non-radial.

Pirelli identifies this MT 60 as a non-radial rear tire, giving buyers a clearly stated construction and position for a 140/80-17 replacement. The listing also specifies tubeless construction in its title, helping riders distinguish its setup details when choosing among similarly sized options.

The MT 60’s 140/80-17 size, rear position, and non-radial construction are the listing’s main selection details. Its title includes M/C 69H MST TL, which identifies the supplied marking and tubeless designation without adding an unstated performance claim. Pirelli presents it as a genuine replacement motorcycle tire sold individually, so the listing is for one tire rather than a pair. The specified 467-pound load capacity is an important consideration for riders assessing their carrying requirements.

Skip it if you need a tire with a stated mixed-surface use case; the Continental TKC 70 is described for road and light off-road riding.

This Pirelli suits buyers seeking a single 140/80-17 non-radial rear replacement with a stated tubeless designation. Its 467-pound listed capacity is a key boundary, and the listing offers no specific terrain-performance claims.

Listed on Amazon as: PIRELLI MT 60-140/80-17 M/C 69H MST TL

#6

6. Bridgestone Battlax Adventure A41

• Size: 140/80R-17 (8706)
• Rim Size: 19 in
• Weight: 16.4 lb
• Load Capacity: 900 lb

Best for: Wet-road adventure touring.

Why it ranks #6: It is a rear adventure-touring tire with wet-performance features and a 900-pound capacity, but its listed 19-inch rim conflicts with the 17-inch size.

The Bridgestone A41’s shoulder grooves are increased to disperse water, giving adventure-touring riders a specific wet-road feature for cornering conditions. Its middle tread uses a reduced groove ratio to target shorter wet braking distance, while the product description also emphasizes stability and wear life.

The A41 is listed as a rear 140/80R-17 adventure tire, and its tread layout connects specific features to wet-road use. Increased shoulder groove ratios are intended to improve water dispersion, while a reduced middle groove ratio is described as reducing braking distance in wet conditions. Bridgestone also states enhanced stability and wear life compared with the A40. Together, those details suit riders who prioritize wet-surface braking and cornering on adventure-touring routes, without implying a particular off-road performance level.

Skip it if you need a front cruiser tire; the Michelin Commander II is explicitly listed for front use and cruiser applications.

The A41 suits adventure-touring riders choosing a rear tire with specific wet-road braking and water-dispersion features. Its rear position and 140/80R-17 size define the application boundary; this listing is not a front-tire option.

Listed on Amazon as: Bridgestone Battlax Adventure A41 Rear Motorcycle Tire 140/80R-17 69V(8706)

#7

7. Bridgestone Battlax BT46 Rear

• Size: 140/80-17 (69V)(11623)
• Rim Size: 18 in
• Weight: 16.1 lb
• Load Capacity: 600 lb

Best for: Vintage touring wet-road.

Why it ranks #7: Its rear 140/80-17 size suits touring and vintage sport use, but the specifications list an 18-inch rim rather than 17 inches.

Bridgestone’s silica single compound in the rear is specified to balance grip and wear, giving all-around riders a touring tire with stated wet-performance improvements. The BT46 is described for vintage sport and touring motorcycles, and its use range spans town streets, winding roads, and longer trips.

The bias-ply construction and vintage sport/touring focus make the BT46 relevant to riders seeking a tire for mixed everyday and touring routes. Bridgestone says the rear’s silica single compound maximizes performance, grip, and wear, while the product description highlights improved wet performance without sacrificing wear life. That combination speaks to riders who encounter both wet roads and extended mileage. The listing gives a 140/80-17 size and 600-pound load capacity; the specified position is rear.

Skip it if you need a front tire; the Michelin Commander II is explicitly listed as a front cruiser tire.

The BT46 fits vintage sport and touring riders who want one rear tire for town use, winding roads, and longer journeys. Its 600-pound listed capacity and rear-only designation are relevant boundaries when planning a setup.

Listed on Amazon as: Bridgestone Battlax BT46 Rear Motorcycle Tire 140/80-17 69V (11623)

#8

8. Michelin Commander II Front

• Size: 140/80B17 (69H)
• Rim Size: 17 in
• Weight: 16.7 lb
• Load Capacity: 1000 lb

Best for: Long-life cruiser front.

Why it ranks #8: It lists 140/80B17, a 1,000-pound capacity, and cruiser use, but is explicitly designated for front fitment.

Michelin’s Amplified Density Technology is cited for increased responsiveness, giving cruiser riders a specific handling benefit in this 140/80B17 front tire. The Commander II is presented for all types of cruisers, with long-lasting performance and stability as central priorities rather than an adventure or off-road focus.

The Commander II’s front designation and cruiser focus narrow its role to riders selecting a front tire for a cruiser setup. Michelin says Amplified Density Technology increases responsiveness, connecting its construction to handling feel, while the product description emphasizes stability and handling alongside longevity. Its listed load capacity is 1,000 pounds, useful context for evaluating carrying needs. Michelin’s near-twice-longevity comparison applies to the rear tire in independent testing, so it should not be treated as a specific front-tire lifespan claim.

Skip it if you need a rear tire with a stated wet-grip compound; the Bridgestone Battlax BT46 is a rear touring option with silica compound details.

Pick the Commander II when your cruiser needs a 140/80B17 front tire and responsiveness, stability, and longevity matter. Its front-only role is the key boundary, and rear-tire longevity claims should not be applied to this listing.

Listed on Amazon as: Michelin Commander II Front Motorcycle Tire – 140/80B17 69H Bias/TL‐TT

#9

9. Kenda K673 Kruz Front

• Size: 140/80-17
• Rim Size: 17 in
• Weight: 16.4 lb

Best for: Large-bike front fit.

Why it ranks #9: This 140/80-17 tire is designed for larger bikes, but its listing identifies it as a front tire rather than a rear option.

Kenda says the K673 Kruz was developed specifically for today’s larger bikes, giving riders a clearly stated application focus in a 140/80-17 front tire. Its 17-inch rim specification helps identify the intended wheel size, while the product title confirms its front position.

The clearest differentiator here is the stated focus on today’s larger bikes, making this K673 Kruz listing more specifically aimed than a generic tire description. The title identifies it as a front tire, and the specifications list a 140/80-17 size with a 17-inch rim. Those details help frame its role during tire selection and installation planning. The supplied information does not provide a load capacity or detailed tread-performance claims, so buyers have fewer stated performance measures to compare.

Skip it if you want stated wet-weather and wear details; the Bridgestone Battlax BT46 provides those rear-tire claims for touring use.

This Kenda is a straightforward candidate for a larger-bike front application matching its listed 140/80-17 size. Choose it when that stated audience and position fit; its supplied details are sparse on load rating and specific road-performance characteristics.

Listed on Amazon as: Kenda K673 Kruz Front Tire (140/80-17)

#10

10. Shinko 777 Front

• Size: 140/80-17
• Rim Size: 17 in
• Weight: 15 lb
• Load Capacity: 717 lb

Best for: Whitewall cruiser touring.

Why it ranks #10: Although it lists 140/80-17 and a 17-inch rim, it is a front tire, making it a weaker match for rear-tire shoppers.

The Shinko 777’s whitewall designation gives cruiser owners a defined styling choice in a 140/80-17 front tire. Its aramid-belted, four-ply-rated carcass supports the listed cruiser and touring role, while the stated 717-pound load capacity helps buyers assess its carrying limit for the intended motorcycle.

This is explicitly a front tire, and Shinko describes the 777 range for cruiser machines, including many V-Twin and metric cruiser models. The aramid-belted four-ply-rated carcass provides construction context for touring use, which the listing associates with high mileage and load capacity. Tubeless construction is also specified, relevant to riders selecting a tubeless tire setup. The listed load capacity is 717 pounds, so riders should treat that as a meaningful constraint when weighing carrying needs.

Skip it if you need a rear tire; the Michelin Anakee Wild is explicitly listed for rear use and carries an adventure-oriented role.

This Shinko suits cruiser owners seeking a whitewall front tire for touring on a compatible setup. Its 717-pound capacity and front-only identification are important boundaries; the listing does not make it a general-purpose rear-tire choice.

Listed on Amazon as: Shinko 777 Front Tire – 140/80-17 WW